<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Which machine gun?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.arizonarifleman.com/2008/05/13/which-machine-gun/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.arizonarifleman.com/2008/05/13/which-machine-gun/</link>
	<description>Shooter, Scientist</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 21:59:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Arizona Rifleman</title>
		<link>http://www.arizonarifleman.com/2008/05/13/which-machine-gun/comment-page-1/#comment-222</link>
		<dc:creator>Arizona Rifleman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Aug 2008 16:32:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://azrifleman.heypete.com/?p=65#comment-222</guid>
		<description>Mike,

Yeah, you and your lack of taxes! *shakes fist at your SOT*

Let me know when you&#039;ll be back in town. It&#039;d be great to go to the range again.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mike,</p>
<p>Yeah, you and your lack of taxes! *shakes fist at your SOT*</p>
<p>Let me know when you&#8217;ll be back in town. It&#8217;d be great to go to the range again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://www.arizonarifleman.com/2008/05/13/which-machine-gun/comment-page-1/#comment-216</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Aug 2008 05:16:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://azrifleman.heypete.com/?p=65#comment-216</guid>
		<description>Here&#039;s the dirty dozen thoughts.

1.  Grease Gun:  More expensive than a Thompson today.  Parts kits getting expensive but mags are a mere $5 or so each.

2.  Uzi:  Not lefty friendly, but cheap parts and mags.  Easy to work on when (oh so rarely) something goes down.  There&#039;s a reason my pre-sample was my first gun and why I still have it.  Mags $15 each.

3.  M16 RR:  It bores me, so I sold it.  However, it will work with nearly any upper out there and parts/mags common.  Be advised that pistol caliber conversions can oval out the pin holes.  Fixing this is annoying.  Mags $10-$15 each.

4.  M16 DIAS:  No receiver to worry over, but simply swapping this between receivers is problematic.  It needs to be timed for each individual setup. 

5.  M16 LL:  Unless you get it cheap, don&#039;t bother.

6.  AC-556:  Generally stuck as it is, but it&#039;s an inexpensive rifle caliber MG with factory service.  Put on a regular wood stock and it&#039;s a stealth MG.  Quality mags $30-$75 each.

7.  MP-5 RR:  Stuck as it is, but they are a decent subgun.  Parts, mags, and repairs are expensive.  Mags $30-$75 each.

8.  MP-5 sear/registered pack:  Allows you to have a MP-5, MP-5SD, G3 (.308), HK-53 (.223), beltfeds, etc.  Mags depend upon caliber with .308 being cheapest around $5 each and .223 being most expensive around $65 each.

9.  Sterling SMG or a Stenling (Sten coverted into a Sterling):  Quality piece, smooth shooting, parts kits can be found and mags around $35 each.  

10.  AUG:  My vote.  They&#039;re just sexy!  Parts will get more common and will fall in price with these new US-made clones coming out.  Mags around $40 and falling.

11.  FNC:  $7,500 or so.  Parts can be rough to find, though.  Uses M16 mags.

12.  STG:  Stemple takedown gun.  BRP Guns got hold of a mess of registered Stemple tubes (meh) and made them into some pretty cool stuff.  Check out http://brpguns.com/  Oh, if you do a M16, get their MG34 8mm M16 beltfed upper.  Mags depend on type of setup used (IIRC).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s the dirty dozen thoughts.</p>
<p>1.  Grease Gun:  More expensive than a Thompson today.  Parts kits getting expensive but mags are a mere $5 or so each.</p>
<p>2.  Uzi:  Not lefty friendly, but cheap parts and mags.  Easy to work on when (oh so rarely) something goes down.  There&#8217;s a reason my pre-sample was my first gun and why I still have it.  Mags $15 each.</p>
<p>3.  M16 RR:  It bores me, so I sold it.  However, it will work with nearly any upper out there and parts/mags common.  Be advised that pistol caliber conversions can oval out the pin holes.  Fixing this is annoying.  Mags $10-$15 each.</p>
<p>4.  M16 DIAS:  No receiver to worry over, but simply swapping this between receivers is problematic.  It needs to be timed for each individual setup. </p>
<p>5.  M16 LL:  Unless you get it cheap, don&#8217;t bother.</p>
<p>6.  AC-556:  Generally stuck as it is, but it&#8217;s an inexpensive rifle caliber MG with factory service.  Put on a regular wood stock and it&#8217;s a stealth MG.  Quality mags $30-$75 each.</p>
<p>7.  MP-5 RR:  Stuck as it is, but they are a decent subgun.  Parts, mags, and repairs are expensive.  Mags $30-$75 each.</p>
<p>8.  MP-5 sear/registered pack:  Allows you to have a MP-5, MP-5SD, G3 (.308), HK-53 (.223), beltfeds, etc.  Mags depend upon caliber with .308 being cheapest around $5 each and .223 being most expensive around $65 each.</p>
<p>9.  Sterling SMG or a Stenling (Sten coverted into a Sterling):  Quality piece, smooth shooting, parts kits can be found and mags around $35 each.  </p>
<p>10.  AUG:  My vote.  They&#8217;re just sexy!  Parts will get more common and will fall in price with these new US-made clones coming out.  Mags around $40 and falling.</p>
<p>11.  FNC:  $7,500 or so.  Parts can be rough to find, though.  Uses M16 mags.</p>
<p>12.  STG:  Stemple takedown gun.  BRP Guns got hold of a mess of registered Stemple tubes (meh) and made them into some pretty cool stuff.  Check out <a href="http://brpguns.com/" rel="nofollow">http://brpguns.com/</a>  Oh, if you do a M16, get their MG34 8mm M16 beltfed upper.  Mags depend on type of setup used (IIRC).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Arizona Rifleman</title>
		<link>http://www.arizonarifleman.com/2008/05/13/which-machine-gun/comment-page-1/#comment-83</link>
		<dc:creator>Arizona Rifleman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 02:58:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://azrifleman.heypete.com/?p=65#comment-83</guid>
		<description>Flash: You&#039;re right. The only restricted part is the lower receiver (or whatever the registered part is, such as a DIAS or Lightning Link) -- everything else can be changed out at will.

The nice thing about a DIAS or LL is that you can transfer them between &quot;carrier&quot; guns -- if your DIAS/LL-equipped gun gets run over by a truck and the registered part survives, you can simply get a new AR and put the DIAS/LL into it. No problem.

-----

George: I was under the impression that Grease Guns were a bit...crude. Also, .45 ACP is way too expensive for my regular pistol ammo, let alone shooting it from a subgun in great amounts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Flash: You&#8217;re right. The only restricted part is the lower receiver (or whatever the registered part is, such as a DIAS or Lightning Link) &#8212; everything else can be changed out at will.</p>
<p>The nice thing about a DIAS or LL is that you can transfer them between &#8220;carrier&#8221; guns &#8212; if your DIAS/LL-equipped gun gets run over by a truck and the registered part survives, you can simply get a new AR and put the DIAS/LL into it. No problem.</p>
<p>&#8212;&#8211;</p>
<p>George: I was under the impression that Grease Guns were a bit&#8230;crude. Also, .45 ACP is way too expensive for my regular pistol ammo, let alone shooting it from a subgun in great amounts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Flash Gordon</title>
		<link>http://www.arizonarifleman.com/2008/05/13/which-machine-gun/comment-page-1/#comment-80</link>
		<dc:creator>Flash Gordon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2008 23:54:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://azrifleman.heypete.com/?p=65#comment-80</guid>
		<description>I agree with you that a sub gun is for fun, not investment.  If the post-1986 ban were lifted I&#039;d gladly settle for a loss in value of a pre-1986 that I had bought.

Another thought, once you have a legally-owned pre-1986 M16 I believe you can buy all the parts you want for it except the receiver that is registered.  If I&#039;m right about that you can practically build it into a new gun.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with you that a sub gun is for fun, not investment.  If the post-1986 ban were lifted I&#8217;d gladly settle for a loss in value of a pre-1986 that I had bought.</p>
<p>Another thought, once you have a legally-owned pre-1986 M16 I believe you can buy all the parts you want for it except the receiver that is registered.  If I&#8217;m right about that you can practically build it into a new gun.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GeorgeH</title>
		<link>http://www.arizonarifleman.com/2008/05/13/which-machine-gun/comment-page-1/#comment-79</link>
		<dc:creator>GeorgeH</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2008 21:36:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://azrifleman.heypete.com/?p=65#comment-79</guid>
		<description>As a Class III dealer years ago, I think I&#039;ve owned everything made through 1975.

An M-3 or M3A1 Greasegun is far and away the most fun. Slow cyclic rate and a round big enough to do the job. Dead simple and almost indestructible. 

Cobble up an interchangeable wood stock.
Get a silencer if you can. A silenced M3 makes more noise slamming the bolt on an empty chamber than it does firing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a Class III dealer years ago, I think I&#8217;ve owned everything made through 1975.</p>
<p>An M-3 or M3A1 Greasegun is far and away the most fun. Slow cyclic rate and a round big enough to do the job. Dead simple and almost indestructible. </p>
<p>Cobble up an interchangeable wood stock.<br />
Get a silencer if you can. A silenced M3 makes more noise slamming the bolt on an empty chamber than it does firing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Arizona Rifleman</title>
		<link>http://www.arizonarifleman.com/2008/05/13/which-machine-gun/comment-page-1/#comment-73</link>
		<dc:creator>Arizona Rifleman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 21:02:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://azrifleman.heypete.com/?p=65#comment-73</guid>
		<description>Cowboy Blob: Hmm. Well, if you ever find yourself wanting to sell the Uzi, let me know. :)

*reads profile* Say, you&#039;re also in Tucson! Want to go to the range and grab a beer (afterwards, of course) some time?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cowboy Blob: Hmm. Well, if you ever find yourself wanting to sell the Uzi, let me know. <img src='http://www.arizonarifleman.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>*reads profile* Say, you&#8217;re also in Tucson! Want to go to the range and grab a beer (afterwards, of course) some time?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Arizona Rifleman</title>
		<link>http://www.arizonarifleman.com/2008/05/13/which-machine-gun/comment-page-1/#comment-72</link>
		<dc:creator>Arizona Rifleman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 20:59:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://azrifleman.heypete.com/?p=65#comment-72</guid>
		<description>Flash: I know the feeling, and those same thoughts have crossed my mind as well.

However, I think I differ a bit from most people when it comes to things like homes and machine guns -- I don&#039;t regard them as investments (although they may well behave like them most of the time).

Instead, I look at a house as a dwelling-place, and a machine gun as something fun to shoot. Nothing more. I don&#039;t usually make such big purchases (car, house, etc.) with the intention of selling it in the near future (condo&#039;s not included, as they&#039;re usually a &quot;starter home&quot;)...I bought my car and intend to drive it into the ground, rather than sell it.

If the ban were overturned and I lost a bunch of money, I might be a little grouchy at first, but in the end I figure it&#039;d benefit me more than it&#039;d harm me (as I could now buy Shiny! New! Guns!).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Flash: I know the feeling, and those same thoughts have crossed my mind as well.</p>
<p>However, I think I differ a bit from most people when it comes to things like homes and machine guns &#8212; I don&#8217;t regard them as investments (although they may well behave like them most of the time).</p>
<p>Instead, I look at a house as a dwelling-place, and a machine gun as something fun to shoot. Nothing more. I don&#8217;t usually make such big purchases (car, house, etc.) with the intention of selling it in the near future (condo&#8217;s not included, as they&#8217;re usually a &#8220;starter home&#8221;)&#8230;I bought my car and intend to drive it into the ground, rather than sell it.</p>
<p>If the ban were overturned and I lost a bunch of money, I might be a little grouchy at first, but in the end I figure it&#8217;d benefit me more than it&#8217;d harm me (as I could now buy Shiny! New! Guns!).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Flash Gordon</title>
		<link>http://www.arizonarifleman.com/2008/05/13/which-machine-gun/comment-page-1/#comment-68</link>
		<dc:creator>Flash Gordon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 16:34:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://azrifleman.heypete.com/?p=65#comment-68</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve thought of spending the big dough that a full auto costs but am put off by the fact that were it not for the post-1986 ban the things would cost under a grand.  It&#039;s probably no more than a pipe dream that the ban will ever be lifted but if it were a 12-15 grand investment would vanish in a heartbeat.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve thought of spending the big dough that a full auto costs but am put off by the fact that were it not for the post-1986 ban the things would cost under a grand.  It&#8217;s probably no more than a pipe dream that the ban will ever be lifted but if it were a 12-15 grand investment would vanish in a heartbeat.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cowboy Blob</title>
		<link>http://www.arizonarifleman.com/2008/05/13/which-machine-gun/comment-page-1/#comment-66</link>
		<dc:creator>Cowboy Blob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 11:30:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://azrifleman.heypete.com/?p=65#comment-66</guid>
		<description>Get the M-16!  (That said, I&#039;ve already got the Uzi and am jones-ing for an M-16 if I&#039;m ever floating in money again).

Lego is fun!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Get the M-16!  (That said, I&#8217;ve already got the Uzi and am jones-ing for an M-16 if I&#8217;m ever floating in money again).</p>
<p>Lego is fun!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Arizona Rifleman</title>
		<link>http://www.arizonarifleman.com/2008/05/13/which-machine-gun/comment-page-1/#comment-59</link>
		<dc:creator>Arizona Rifleman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 19:33:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://azrifleman.heypete.com/?p=65#comment-59</guid>
		<description>Rustmeister:
- Yeah, I&#039;ve heard about HKs sucky customer service. But still, there&#039;s a part of me that says &quot;HK! Shiny!&quot; It&#039;s hard ignoring that...well, at least it&#039;s hard ignoring it until I see the price tag. Then it becomes easy to ignore.
- Well, my thoughts on the Ruger are that it&#039;s an &quot;automatic rifle&quot;, so putting 100-round Beta mag dumps downrange is probably not what it was designed for. I&#039;d think that it&#039;d be perfectly suitable for most fun full-auto uses, but not for a huge amount of sustained fire.
- One of the reasons I was looking at the M16/Ruger is that they can easily shoot .22LR. Cheap ammo is always something to be thinking about when you&#039;ll easily blow through a huge amount of ammo at the range. The Uzi does have .22 kits, but I hear they&#039;re not nearly as reliable (and you can&#039;t really use them if you have a registered bolt, rather than a registered receiver).

Decisions, decisions!

.....

Sebastian blew my hit counter out of the water today. It&#039;s good, but somewhat nerve-wracking to know &quot;hey, some people are actually reading this!&quot;. No pressure. :)

Anyway, thanks for your kind words and the add, I appreciate it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rustmeister:<br />
- Yeah, I&#8217;ve heard about HKs sucky customer service. But still, there&#8217;s a part of me that says &#8220;HK! Shiny!&#8221; It&#8217;s hard ignoring that&#8230;well, at least it&#8217;s hard ignoring it until I see the price tag. Then it becomes easy to ignore.<br />
- Well, my thoughts on the Ruger are that it&#8217;s an &#8220;automatic rifle&#8221;, so putting 100-round Beta mag dumps downrange is probably not what it was designed for. I&#8217;d think that it&#8217;d be perfectly suitable for most fun full-auto uses, but not for a huge amount of sustained fire.<br />
- One of the reasons I was looking at the M16/Ruger is that they can easily shoot .22LR. Cheap ammo is always something to be thinking about when you&#8217;ll easily blow through a huge amount of ammo at the range. The Uzi does have .22 kits, but I hear they&#8217;re not nearly as reliable (and you can&#8217;t really use them if you have a registered bolt, rather than a registered receiver).</p>
<p>Decisions, decisions!</p>
<p>&#8230;..</p>
<p>Sebastian blew my hit counter out of the water today. It&#8217;s good, but somewhat nerve-wracking to know &#8220;hey, some people are actually reading this!&#8221;. No pressure. <img src='http://www.arizonarifleman.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Anyway, thanks for your kind words and the add, I appreciate it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

